Prev: lock-based-concurrent-data-structures Next: semaphores
Condition variables are for cases where a thread needs to check that a certain condition has been met before continuing.
Imagine a parent, which spawns a child thread. The parent needs to wait for the child thread to finish, but obviously wouldn’t want to spin-lock.
The spin-lock version is inefficient:
volatile int done = 0;
void *child(void *arg) {
printf("child\n");
done = 1;
return NULL;
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
printf("parent: begin\n");
pthread_t c;
Pthread_create(&c, NULL, child, NULL); // create child
while (done == 0)
; // spin
printf("parent: end\n");
return 0;
}We use condition variables, where a thread sleeps (uses no CPU) until another thread signals the desired condition and wakes the thread (like park/unpark and futex).
int done = 0;
pthread_mutex_t m = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
pthread_cond_t c = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
void thr_exit() {
Pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
done = 1;
Pthread_cond_signal(&c);
Pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
}
void *child(void *arg) {
printf("child\n");
thr_exit();
return NULL;
}
void thr_join() {
Pthread_mutex_lock(&m);
while (done == 0)
Pthread_cond_wait(&c, &m);
Pthread_mutex_unlock(&m);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
printf("parent: begin\n");
pthread_t p;
Pthread_create(&p, NULL, child, NULL);
thr_join();
printf("parent: end\n");
return 0;
}The POSIX calls look like so:
pthread_cond_wait(pthread_cond_t *c, pthread_mutex_t *m);
pthread_cond_signal(pthread_cond_t *c);CondVars require a mutex, condition var to signal, and a variable to mutate.
The Producer Consumer problem arises when producers produce data into some shared data structure and consumers read from it concurrently.
Take an example like so:
int buffer;
int count = 0; // initially, empty
void put(int value) {
assert(count == 0);
count = 1;
buffer = value;
}
int get() {
assert(count == 1);
count = 0;
return buffer;
}void producer(void *arg) {
int i;
int loops = (int)arg;
for (i = 0; i < loops; i++) {
put(i);
}
}
void consumer(void *arg) {
while (1) {
int tmp = get();
printf("%d\n", tmp);
}
}One broken approach might look like this:
int loops; // must initialize somewhere...
cond_t cond;
mutex_t mutex;
void *producer(void *arg) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < loops; i++) {
Pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); // p1
if (count == 1) // p2
Pthread_cond_wait(&cond, &mutex); // p3
put(i); // p4
Pthread_cond_signal(&cond); // p5
Pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex); // p6
}
}
void *consumer(void *arg) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < loops; i++) {
Pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); // c1
if (count == 0) // c2
Pthread_cond_wait(&cond, &mutex); // c3
int tmp = get(); // c4
Pthread_cond_signal(&cond); // c5
Pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex); // c6
printf("%d\n", tmp);
}
}This unfortunately only works for a single consumer and producer. If a consumer comes first, goes to sleep, then a producer puts data on the buffer, and signals to the first thread, another thread could come in its place and process the buffer.
This is because signals have Mesa Semantics, where a
woken thread is not guaranteed to be the next thread that runs.
Hoare Semantics would guarantee this, but these
semantics are rare.
This can be fixed by using a while loop instead of an if
conditional.
int loops;
cond_t cond;
mutex_t mutex;
void producer(void *arg) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < loops; i++) {
Pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); // p1
while (count == 1) // p2
Pthread_cond_wait(&cond, &mutex); // p3
put(i); // p4
Pthread_cond_signal(&cond); // p5
Pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex); // p6
}
}
void consumer(void *arg) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < loops; i++) {
Pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); // c1
while (count == 0) // c2
Pthread_cond_wait(&cond, &mutex); // c3
int tmp = get(); // c4
Pthread_cond_signal(&cond); // c5
Pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex); // c6
printf("%d\n", tmp);
}
}This, however, leads to deadlock, as none of the threads can make progress.
To solve this problem, we use two condvars, one for producers and one for consumers.
int buffer[MAX];
int fill_ptr = 0;
int use_ptr = 0;
int count = 0;
void put(int value) {
buffer[fill_ptr] = value;
fill_ptr = (fill_ptr + 1) % MAX;
count++;
}
int get() {
int tmp = buffer[use_ptr];
use_ptr = (use_ptr + 1) % MAX;
count--;
return tmp;
}cond_t empty, fill;
mutex_t mutex;
void *producer(void *arg) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < loops; i++) {
Pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); // p1
while (count == MAX) // p2
Pthread_cond_wait(&empty, &mutex); // p3
put(i); // p4
Pthread_cond_signal(&fill); // p5
Pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex); // p6
}
}
void *consumer(void *arg) {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < loops; i++) {
Pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); // c1
while (count == 0) // c2
Pthread_cond_wait(&fill, &mutex); // c3
int tmp = get(); // c4
Pthread_cond_signal(&empty); // c5
Pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex); // c6
printf("%d\n", tmp);
}
}There is one more use for condvars, where a producer wants to broadcast to all consumers.
Imagine a situation where one thread calls malloc(100)
and another thread calls malloc(10) and both go to sleep,
because there is not enough memory. Next, a call to
free(50) comes back, but it doesn’t know which threads to
wake up (if it wakes up the thread calling for malloc(100),
it goes back to sleep).
To solve this problem, the code will instead call
pthread_cond_broadcast(), which wakes up all waiting
threads. This guarantees that the resource at hand (bytes from the
allocator) is used efficiently, even if waking up threads may be
inefficient sometimes.
Prev: lock-based-concurrent-data-structures Next: semaphores